Redux Holdings announced today that they have acquired the remaining shares of Koloseum Nutritional Sciences ("KNS") that they didn't already own. (FYI: they owned 30% before today's announcement.) This has obviously been in the works for a while as the owners of KNS, Rick Robinette and Milos Sarcev, have been part of the Naturade team for many months now as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Science Officer, respectively.
So what does this transaction really mean? Is it important?
Well, here is what I think it does for the Company. First, it provides a new product line to market alongside the Naturade brand to a large network that is already in place. Naturade is in stores all across the United States (as well as some international locations) like grocery stores, natural food stores, Sam's Clubs, vitamin stores and many more. The Naturade brand typically targets the mass audience (moms and pops of the world).
The KNS line targets athletes.
Why does it matter? Well, is there a more efficient way to introduce leading edge, proprietary, nutritional formulas into your "everyday" product line than to take it from a sister product line that already produces supplements for world class athletes?
I have met with both Rick Robinette and Milos Sarcev and believe they are both savvy businessmen. Rick is a marketing guy with many industry credits to his name. He has been around the industry for about 20 years and is well connected with buyers (these are the people that work for the retailers and represent the contact point that you want to know in order to get your products the required shelf space.)
Milos Sarcev has been quoted by top fitness magazine editors (FLEX Magizine) as having one of the best minds of our age regarding health and nutrition and how it relates to developing the body. Milos was the 1989 Mr. Universe and has an incredible ability to train high end (mostly professional) athletes and maximize their performance. Now that KNS will be available on a wider distribution, athletes around the globe will be able to get the benefits of Milos’ most advanced nutritional formulas.
Now that Naturade has exited bankruptcy and appears to be on sound footing financially, I am looking forward to seeing how that Company grows its distribution network. Adding KNS to the mix should add another quality product to the offering and should be a step in the right direction.
DISCLOSURE: I am a large holder of Redux stock as I assisted Redux in becoming a public entity back in 2006. I continue to work with the Company on IR and Capital Markets Advisory issues and receive compensation for my services.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
OTCBB: CYRX - In the news?
Now I don't typically put a lot of credence in what is posted on chat boards; however, a year or so ago I was made aware of a large manufacturing firm in the dry ice space that wanted a piece of the action over at CryoPort. At that time I heard that the manufacturing firm was willing to commit a million sq ft of floor space to ramp up the large scale production of the CryoPort Express One-Way Shipper.
Today on http://www.icecoldstocks.com/, the Iceman made a quick "whisper" comment during his "Dollar Man" podcast about possible news of a European manufacturer that was earmarking up to a million square feet to work with CryoPort. Now I don't know if it is the same manufacturing firm, I would bet that it is, and I don't know when the deal will become public, if there is one. But ... I do know that if a billion dollar manufacturing firm is dedicating a million square feet of their floorspace to support the CryoPort Express One-Way Shipper, they are not doing it for free and they expect to do A LOT of shippers. A million square feet is an enormous facility, which has a large carrying cost. If this "whisper" by the Iceman comes to fruition, I would expect things over at CryoPort to start picking up pace very rapidly.
Dollar Man Commentary: HERE (Audio: CYRX at the very end.)
Whisper Page: HERE (Text: CYRX is at the top.)
I really don't think that many investors have really put together a vision for their CYRX shares in regards to future valuation. Well, just take some very ballpark figures for example. There have been "rumors" on internet boards that FedEx ships over 300 million frozen packages on a global basis each year. If CryoPort were to ship 100 million shippers each year at an average of say, $80 per shipper (including shipping costs), they would do $8 billion (that's billion with a "B") in revenues. They would have to account for cost of manufacturing, shipping and corporate expenses. While I think they have better margins, let's assume that they can make 8% net profit based on the top end revenue line, they would make $640,000,000 in earnings. Currently, on a fully diluted and converted basis, they would have about 55-60 million shares outstanding.
You do the math.
DISCLOSURE: I worked with CryoPort from mid 2004 thru August 2007. I assisted them in becoming a public company and I am pretty comfortable with the story. On my private equity side, I own stock and warrants in CryoPort. I have not sold any stock to date and don't intend to sell any stock anywhere remotely close to the current price. I might look to sell a few shares over $10. For the record, I am not working with them in any capacity at this time.
Today on http://www.icecoldstocks.com/, the Iceman made a quick "whisper" comment during his "Dollar Man" podcast about possible news of a European manufacturer that was earmarking up to a million square feet to work with CryoPort. Now I don't know if it is the same manufacturing firm, I would bet that it is, and I don't know when the deal will become public, if there is one. But ... I do know that if a billion dollar manufacturing firm is dedicating a million square feet of their floorspace to support the CryoPort Express One-Way Shipper, they are not doing it for free and they expect to do A LOT of shippers. A million square feet is an enormous facility, which has a large carrying cost. If this "whisper" by the Iceman comes to fruition, I would expect things over at CryoPort to start picking up pace very rapidly.
Dollar Man Commentary: HERE (Audio: CYRX at the very end.)
Whisper Page: HERE (Text: CYRX is at the top.)
I really don't think that many investors have really put together a vision for their CYRX shares in regards to future valuation. Well, just take some very ballpark figures for example. There have been "rumors" on internet boards that FedEx ships over 300 million frozen packages on a global basis each year. If CryoPort were to ship 100 million shippers each year at an average of say, $80 per shipper (including shipping costs), they would do $8 billion (that's billion with a "B") in revenues. They would have to account for cost of manufacturing, shipping and corporate expenses. While I think they have better margins, let's assume that they can make 8% net profit based on the top end revenue line, they would make $640,000,000 in earnings. Currently, on a fully diluted and converted basis, they would have about 55-60 million shares outstanding.
You do the math.
DISCLOSURE: I worked with CryoPort from mid 2004 thru August 2007. I assisted them in becoming a public company and I am pretty comfortable with the story. On my private equity side, I own stock and warrants in CryoPort. I have not sold any stock to date and don't intend to sell any stock anywhere remotely close to the current price. I might look to sell a few shares over $10. For the record, I am not working with them in any capacity at this time.
Friday, February 1, 2008
(OTC: RDXH) Redux Holdings, Inc.
Redux Holdings, Inc. (Quote: RDXH) is a stock that is not really on anyone's radar at the present time. In a nutshell, Redux goes out and acquires distressed companies and/or cherry picks assets from distressed companies that private equity firms, hedge funds, mutual funds, venture capitalists, etc. would like to get rid of. The management team at Redux is an experienced group of industry veterans comprised of members of Enterprise Solutions Group (http://www.eginc.net) and others. The team is experienced in M&A plays of financially or operationally distressed companies and has handled companies ranging from millions to billions.
Just a heads up: An interesting article about Redux Holdings is currently on the front page of the current Los Angeles Business Journal titled: Company Spinning Turnaround Process.
In 2005, Adam Michelin, Redux's CEO, asked me if I would be interested in assisting him in building a publicly traded M&A firm that would focus on turnaround scenarios in leveraged transactions. I told him that I might, it would just depend on the deal. After doing a little more due diligence on Adam, I realized that he was a well established, well connected and well respected player in the distressed company turnaround industry. I agreed to move forward on the project and Redux Holdings was the result of these joint efforts.
For those who are wondering what the name Redux means, according to a Latin translation (freely available on the internet): Redux - ducis adj.: act. [bringing back , restoring]; pass. [brought back, returned].
My definition: “Rebirth”: ie: rebirth of an asset; taking an asset that was mismanaged or which failed for a specific reason and isolating and repairing the deficiency while returning the asset to its full potential value.
The root name is a proper description of what the company does with selected “orphaned assets” and distressed corporations. Redux identifies the valuable assets that are part of a poorly run operation, strips them out and isolates them in a new entity, brings in the necessary management and capital to fix any outstanding issues and returns the asset to profitability.
The primary objective for Redux Holdings is to identify potentially beneficial assets, acquire them at deeply discounted prices, and quickly restore them to profitable operations. The firm focuses on primary areas in which it intends to maintain a long term presence, called Permanent Core Groups. Currently, the core groups consist of:
1.) Consumer Services
2.) Nutrition and Supplements
3.) Technology
I won't go into great detail on my blog since I have an Investor Fact Sheet available on my website that can be downloaded free of charge. The fact sheet gives a much more in-depth overview of the pieces that are currently in the Redux portfolio. I am presently working on updating this for the Company, but this somewhat dated version still provides a pretty accurate picture and gives a good overall review.
I am currently discussing Redux with a number of accredited investors on my private equity side and I believe that Redux is on the right track. Redux bought the majority ownership of Naturade (Quote: NRDCQ) in August 2006. (Not sure why they have not dropped the “Q”, but getting that resolved is in process.) Anyway, Naturade had been cash flow negative for 5 years prior to Redux taking control. In November 2007, Naturade came out of bankruptcy and was recently put back on the OTCBB (See January 18, 2008: 8k filing). Although I am not sure of the method that will be used to implement a filing, I expect that Redux will become OTCBB in the near future as well.
DISCLOSURE: I helped this company to become public, I own stock in the company and I am a compensated consultant to the company for IR and Capital Markets Advisory.
Additional note: The float on this company is very small, I own a bunch of shares and there is not much stock available for trading. When it does start trading, I expect it will be tough to find stock to buy, but that is okay with me, since I already own my shares. :)
Just a heads up: An interesting article about Redux Holdings is currently on the front page of the current Los Angeles Business Journal titled: Company Spinning Turnaround Process.
In 2005, Adam Michelin, Redux's CEO, asked me if I would be interested in assisting him in building a publicly traded M&A firm that would focus on turnaround scenarios in leveraged transactions. I told him that I might, it would just depend on the deal. After doing a little more due diligence on Adam, I realized that he was a well established, well connected and well respected player in the distressed company turnaround industry. I agreed to move forward on the project and Redux Holdings was the result of these joint efforts.
For those who are wondering what the name Redux means, according to a Latin translation (freely available on the internet): Redux - ducis adj.: act. [bringing back , restoring]; pass. [brought back, returned].
My definition: “Rebirth”: ie: rebirth of an asset; taking an asset that was mismanaged or which failed for a specific reason and isolating and repairing the deficiency while returning the asset to its full potential value.
The root name is a proper description of what the company does with selected “orphaned assets” and distressed corporations. Redux identifies the valuable assets that are part of a poorly run operation, strips them out and isolates them in a new entity, brings in the necessary management and capital to fix any outstanding issues and returns the asset to profitability.
The primary objective for Redux Holdings is to identify potentially beneficial assets, acquire them at deeply discounted prices, and quickly restore them to profitable operations. The firm focuses on primary areas in which it intends to maintain a long term presence, called Permanent Core Groups. Currently, the core groups consist of:
1.) Consumer Services
2.) Nutrition and Supplements
3.) Technology
I won't go into great detail on my blog since I have an Investor Fact Sheet available on my website that can be downloaded free of charge. The fact sheet gives a much more in-depth overview of the pieces that are currently in the Redux portfolio. I am presently working on updating this for the Company, but this somewhat dated version still provides a pretty accurate picture and gives a good overall review.
I am currently discussing Redux with a number of accredited investors on my private equity side and I believe that Redux is on the right track. Redux bought the majority ownership of Naturade (Quote: NRDCQ) in August 2006. (Not sure why they have not dropped the “Q”, but getting that resolved is in process.) Anyway, Naturade had been cash flow negative for 5 years prior to Redux taking control. In November 2007, Naturade came out of bankruptcy and was recently put back on the OTCBB (See January 18, 2008: 8k filing). Although I am not sure of the method that will be used to implement a filing, I expect that Redux will become OTCBB in the near future as well.
DISCLOSURE: I helped this company to become public, I own stock in the company and I am a compensated consultant to the company for IR and Capital Markets Advisory.
Additional note: The float on this company is very small, I own a bunch of shares and there is not much stock available for trading. When it does start trading, I expect it will be tough to find stock to buy, but that is okay with me, since I already own my shares. :)
Thursday, January 17, 2008
(OTC: GWYI) Where oh where did my GWYI go?
A number of investors have contacted me over the past few quarters to find out the status on Gateway International Holdings (“Gateway”). Well, I wish I had some more “concrete” news to pass along, but I will pass along what I do know.
I had dinner with Tim Consalvi, Gateway’s CEO on January 3rd. He said that the Company is working towards getting to a point where they can get their stock trading again. I believe Tim when he says that he “wants to do what is right by the shareholders, but they don’t want to find themselves in a situation with the SEC where they miss another filing date.” I tend to agree with this assessment, I just wish they would do what is necessary to both file and not miss a date. If they were to miss a filing after moving back to a reporting company, I think Tim is concerned as to what action the SEC might take towards the Company, or potentially towards him personally.
So where does that leave investors. Well, the SAP system is "supposed" to be up and running by the end of this month. (I'll believe it when I see it.) Steve Kasprisin, Gateway’s CFO, left the Company in the fall and left Gateway in a precarious position of not having the right personnel in place. Steve was brought on as CFO in November 2006 to get all of the reporting issues squared away, get the financials to where everything could get closed out on time and prepare the Company to re-file its Form 10SB with the SEC. Steve convinced the Company to spend a lot of money on a new SAP ERP Business Suite and supporting staff, which would have been a little more acceptable had he completed his task. Instead, he bolted for another job and the Company is still trying to finish out what Steve started.
I have been told that they are going to have SAP up and running by the end of January and then for the month of February Tim wants to run dual accounting programs to make sure that everything is balancing to the penny. Once they feel comfortable with the SAP system, they will drop their old system and be able to close out their books in a timely fashion and they will feel better about filing with the SEC.
Just using history as my guide, I'll hope for February with the SAP, two months of concurrent accounting instead of one, leaving the Company fully on SAP by itself for May and June and then the audit.
I have suggested to them that they consider a reverse merger into a Pink Sheet shell. This method would prevent them from having to file a Form 10SB at all (unless they decide later that they want to move to the OTCBB) and they could return to trading very quickly and for less cost. To date, my desire has apparently fallen on deaf ears. If the Company is not trading within the next 6 months, we may have to consider other alternatives. There are a number of shareholders that are considering taking legal action if the shares are not trading in the near future, however, to date I have asked them to remain patient. In about 6-9 months, I have a feeling all gloves will come off.
For what it is worth, the Company is apparently doing very well from an operational standpoint. They have recently achieved certain industry certifications that will allow for the Eran Engineering subsidiary to move from a sub-tier contractor to a Tier 1 contractor. This is a very big development for Eran as this will allow them to bid directly for larger projects with companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. This will also allow for production at better margins … although the margins at Eran Engineering are already quite good.
Sales have continued to grow on the new and refurbished CNC equipment sales side and Tim Consalvi has been spending a fair amount of his time servicing the new equipment sales business. While I understand that it is important to make sure that All-American CNC Sales continues to grow, I wish he would focus more on getting Gateway back to a tradable status.
As it stands right now, for the year I think the Company could make in the 6 to 8 cents per share range for a pre-tax profit number (their year ends June 30). While it might not show up on EPS for another year due to carry forward write downs that they can use for tax purposes, the Company is generating pretty good cash flow. On a continuing operations basis, the Company has grown internally at roughly 50% on a year over year basis for several years now and with the 400% expansion of their new manufacturing facilities, I don’t see any reason for that to slow down. If one were to apply the equivalent of a 1.0 PEG ratio to the forecasted EBITDA, I can see a realistic valuation in the $3 - $4 range after the stock starts trading again. It was well on its way at around $2.35 per share when the SEC order was issued back in 2005.
The audit for last year is ready to be submitted to the SEC. The Company’s yearend is now 5 months away. Although I don’t like it, I have a feeling that Gateway is going to wait until late this summer to file their Form 10SB, after they have closed a couple of quarters under the new accounting system and they get their second complete audit under their belts. While this is certainly the cleanest way to get back to trading, it just takes a while, which is requiring more patience … and mine is running thin.
I’ll keep you posted if I hear anything new.
If you have questions, call Tim Consalvi directly at 714-630-6253.
DISCLOSURE: I worked with Gateway as a Capital Markets Advisor and Investor Relations Consultant from 2003 thru 2007. However, at present, while they remain non-trading, I am not under any type of contract as they have indicated that their desire is to reduce expenses. Also for the record, as part of my private equity holdings, I own stock in Gateway International Holdings and have clients that own stock in the Company as well.
I had dinner with Tim Consalvi, Gateway’s CEO on January 3rd. He said that the Company is working towards getting to a point where they can get their stock trading again. I believe Tim when he says that he “wants to do what is right by the shareholders, but they don’t want to find themselves in a situation with the SEC where they miss another filing date.” I tend to agree with this assessment, I just wish they would do what is necessary to both file and not miss a date. If they were to miss a filing after moving back to a reporting company, I think Tim is concerned as to what action the SEC might take towards the Company, or potentially towards him personally.
So where does that leave investors. Well, the SAP system is "supposed" to be up and running by the end of this month. (I'll believe it when I see it.) Steve Kasprisin, Gateway’s CFO, left the Company in the fall and left Gateway in a precarious position of not having the right personnel in place. Steve was brought on as CFO in November 2006 to get all of the reporting issues squared away, get the financials to where everything could get closed out on time and prepare the Company to re-file its Form 10SB with the SEC. Steve convinced the Company to spend a lot of money on a new SAP ERP Business Suite and supporting staff, which would have been a little more acceptable had he completed his task. Instead, he bolted for another job and the Company is still trying to finish out what Steve started.
I have been told that they are going to have SAP up and running by the end of January and then for the month of February Tim wants to run dual accounting programs to make sure that everything is balancing to the penny. Once they feel comfortable with the SAP system, they will drop their old system and be able to close out their books in a timely fashion and they will feel better about filing with the SEC.
Just using history as my guide, I'll hope for February with the SAP, two months of concurrent accounting instead of one, leaving the Company fully on SAP by itself for May and June and then the audit.
I have suggested to them that they consider a reverse merger into a Pink Sheet shell. This method would prevent them from having to file a Form 10SB at all (unless they decide later that they want to move to the OTCBB) and they could return to trading very quickly and for less cost. To date, my desire has apparently fallen on deaf ears. If the Company is not trading within the next 6 months, we may have to consider other alternatives. There are a number of shareholders that are considering taking legal action if the shares are not trading in the near future, however, to date I have asked them to remain patient. In about 6-9 months, I have a feeling all gloves will come off.
For what it is worth, the Company is apparently doing very well from an operational standpoint. They have recently achieved certain industry certifications that will allow for the Eran Engineering subsidiary to move from a sub-tier contractor to a Tier 1 contractor. This is a very big development for Eran as this will allow them to bid directly for larger projects with companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. This will also allow for production at better margins … although the margins at Eran Engineering are already quite good.
Sales have continued to grow on the new and refurbished CNC equipment sales side and Tim Consalvi has been spending a fair amount of his time servicing the new equipment sales business. While I understand that it is important to make sure that All-American CNC Sales continues to grow, I wish he would focus more on getting Gateway back to a tradable status.
As it stands right now, for the year I think the Company could make in the 6 to 8 cents per share range for a pre-tax profit number (their year ends June 30). While it might not show up on EPS for another year due to carry forward write downs that they can use for tax purposes, the Company is generating pretty good cash flow. On a continuing operations basis, the Company has grown internally at roughly 50% on a year over year basis for several years now and with the 400% expansion of their new manufacturing facilities, I don’t see any reason for that to slow down. If one were to apply the equivalent of a 1.0 PEG ratio to the forecasted EBITDA, I can see a realistic valuation in the $3 - $4 range after the stock starts trading again. It was well on its way at around $2.35 per share when the SEC order was issued back in 2005.
The audit for last year is ready to be submitted to the SEC. The Company’s yearend is now 5 months away. Although I don’t like it, I have a feeling that Gateway is going to wait until late this summer to file their Form 10SB, after they have closed a couple of quarters under the new accounting system and they get their second complete audit under their belts. While this is certainly the cleanest way to get back to trading, it just takes a while, which is requiring more patience … and mine is running thin.
I’ll keep you posted if I hear anything new.
If you have questions, call Tim Consalvi directly at 714-630-6253.
DISCLOSURE: I worked with Gateway as a Capital Markets Advisor and Investor Relations Consultant from 2003 thru 2007. However, at present, while they remain non-trading, I am not under any type of contract as they have indicated that their desire is to reduce expenses. Also for the record, as part of my private equity holdings, I own stock in Gateway International Holdings and have clients that own stock in the Company as well.
Monday, January 14, 2008
(OTCBB: CYRX) Dry ice is not really that dangerous, right?
So the first time I heard of "dry ice bombs" was on a Google search when I looked up dry ice explosion after hearing about what happens to dry ice if kept under pressure for too long. Boy was I surprised when I started watching YouTube vidoes of a bunch of morons making dry ice bombs.
Now I will claim ignorance up until this point, as I had never had experience handling dry ice. But let's just say that you don't have to worry about me storing any of that stuff around my house. This is exactly what a biology professor at a Northeastern college did only to come home to a street full of police, fire and rescue workers after a container that was in his lunch box exploded.
Seriously, I can't make this stuff up: http://www.newsday.com/news/local/ny-liboom0113,0,6524957,print.story
Now, if reading this piece makes you wonder how much impact a couple of pieces of dry ice can really create, check these out:
1) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7894391895156535748
2) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3966798922638533240.
3) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-505112331200415552
WARNING: PLEASE DON"T BE A MORON. DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME! Hopefully, if you are spending time reading a blog about the markets and investment opportunities, you are not into blowing things up (like your hand). But if you go and do something stupid ... don't say I didn't warn you.
Now, you are probably asking, "What is the point of this post?" Well, do you think these few examples (there are a ton of them available) might clearly demonstrate why a company like FedEx might not want to use dry ice on their commercial airplanes for millions and millions and millions (did I say millions?) of express shipments? Remember, only a very closely monitored amount of dry ice can even be legally loaded onto a plane. A plane is a pressurized vessel, too much dry ice and ... boom! Dry ice and airplanes = not good. Wouldn't it be better to find something that doesn't explode?
If you can agree with the concept, perhaps you could agree that the one-way express shipper from CryoPort (OTCBB: CYRX) (http://www.cryoport.com/) might be a technology that is going to change cold shipping as we currently know it. Based on the public press releases by the Company, my guess is that we will start hearing about companies moving their cold shipping over to the CryoPort Express One-Way Shipper platform during the first half of 2008. I suspect that all of these new clients will be shipping through FedEx. I expect them to be small companies at first, gradually increasing in size, which would make perfect sense because the company is just now ramping up production to meet demand. Then, once the platform has proven itself, I expect LARGE companies to begin using the new option ... in LARGE amounts.
DISCLOSURE: I worked with CryoPort from mid 2004 thru August 2007. I assisted them in becoming a public company and I am pretty comfortable with the story. In my personal private equity holdings, I personally own stock in CryoPort. I have also purchased a significant amount of stock for clients through my advisory firm. Although I am not 100% positive, I am probably the largest single buyer of CYRX stock on the open market since it started trading. I have not sold any stock to date. And for the record, I am NOT working with them in any capacity at the present time.
Do I think that within the next year or two this stock will be on television with all of the "talking heads" (ie: Cramer, Fast Money, etc.) saying "How the heck did we miss this one?"
Yep and I'll be smiling the whole time.
Now I will claim ignorance up until this point, as I had never had experience handling dry ice. But let's just say that you don't have to worry about me storing any of that stuff around my house. This is exactly what a biology professor at a Northeastern college did only to come home to a street full of police, fire and rescue workers after a container that was in his lunch box exploded.
Seriously, I can't make this stuff up: http://www.newsday.com/news/local/ny-liboom0113,0,6524957,print.story
Now, if reading this piece makes you wonder how much impact a couple of pieces of dry ice can really create, check these out:
1) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7894391895156535748
2) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3966798922638533240.
3) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-505112331200415552
WARNING: PLEASE DON"T BE A MORON. DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME! Hopefully, if you are spending time reading a blog about the markets and investment opportunities, you are not into blowing things up (like your hand). But if you go and do something stupid ... don't say I didn't warn you.
Now, you are probably asking, "What is the point of this post?" Well, do you think these few examples (there are a ton of them available) might clearly demonstrate why a company like FedEx might not want to use dry ice on their commercial airplanes for millions and millions and millions (did I say millions?) of express shipments? Remember, only a very closely monitored amount of dry ice can even be legally loaded onto a plane. A plane is a pressurized vessel, too much dry ice and ... boom! Dry ice and airplanes = not good. Wouldn't it be better to find something that doesn't explode?
If you can agree with the concept, perhaps you could agree that the one-way express shipper from CryoPort (OTCBB: CYRX) (http://www.cryoport.com/) might be a technology that is going to change cold shipping as we currently know it. Based on the public press releases by the Company, my guess is that we will start hearing about companies moving their cold shipping over to the CryoPort Express One-Way Shipper platform during the first half of 2008. I suspect that all of these new clients will be shipping through FedEx. I expect them to be small companies at first, gradually increasing in size, which would make perfect sense because the company is just now ramping up production to meet demand. Then, once the platform has proven itself, I expect LARGE companies to begin using the new option ... in LARGE amounts.
DISCLOSURE: I worked with CryoPort from mid 2004 thru August 2007. I assisted them in becoming a public company and I am pretty comfortable with the story. In my personal private equity holdings, I personally own stock in CryoPort. I have also purchased a significant amount of stock for clients through my advisory firm. Although I am not 100% positive, I am probably the largest single buyer of CYRX stock on the open market since it started trading. I have not sold any stock to date. And for the record, I am NOT working with them in any capacity at the present time.
Do I think that within the next year or two this stock will be on television with all of the "talking heads" (ie: Cramer, Fast Money, etc.) saying "How the heck did we miss this one?"
Yep and I'll be smiling the whole time.
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Introduction
Well, I have officially become a blogger. I must admit, I have never paid much attention to blogs, but as I read more and more about the success people are having at reaching both broad and diverse audiences by utilizing this type of platform, I am willing to give it the "old college try".
In this blog, I will touch on a number of subjects. I will discuss personal investments, projects that I am working on, sector specific and industry information that I find intriguing, as well as general stock market commentary from time to time.
Initially, I don't anticipate that this will be a daily blog, but who knows, maybe it will turn into a bigger piece of my investor communications as it develops. For those who are looking for additional resource material into subject matter included in this blog, I would suggest that you start your search at my primary websites. For investment advisory information you can visit http://www.meehancapital.com/. For information on specific companies that I consult to regarding capital advisory and investor relations issues, visit http://www.firstcapitalinvestors.com/. Lastly, if you are an accredited investor who is interested in learning more about private equity, angel investments and venture capital opportunities, visit http://www.m3vc.com/.
I look forward to utilizing this blog as an efficient method of sharing my thoughts and keeping my fellow shareholders as informed as possible as to the progression of our investments and potential opportunities.
In this blog, I will touch on a number of subjects. I will discuss personal investments, projects that I am working on, sector specific and industry information that I find intriguing, as well as general stock market commentary from time to time.
Initially, I don't anticipate that this will be a daily blog, but who knows, maybe it will turn into a bigger piece of my investor communications as it develops. For those who are looking for additional resource material into subject matter included in this blog, I would suggest that you start your search at my primary websites. For investment advisory information you can visit http://www.meehancapital.com/. For information on specific companies that I consult to regarding capital advisory and investor relations issues, visit http://www.firstcapitalinvestors.com/. Lastly, if you are an accredited investor who is interested in learning more about private equity, angel investments and venture capital opportunities, visit http://www.m3vc.com/.
I look forward to utilizing this blog as an efficient method of sharing my thoughts and keeping my fellow shareholders as informed as possible as to the progression of our investments and potential opportunities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)